India Exposed Chinese Air Defence System with Just ONE DOCUMENT published by PIB
In a bold demonstration of its growing indigenous defence capabilities, India recently executed "Operation Sindoor," a strategic incursion that not only neutralized key terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan but also exposed a critical weakness in China's much-touted HQ9 air defence system. The official document released by the Press Information Bureau, titled Operation SINDOOR: The Rise of Aatmanirbhar Innovation in National Security , details this operation, highlighting India's technological superiority and its commitment to "Atmanirbhar" (self-reliant) innovation in national security.
The operation, conducted with remarkable speed and precision in just 23 minutes, saw the Indian Air Force (IAF) successfully jamming and bypassing Pakistan's Chinese-supplied air defence systems, including the HQ9. This allowed Indian strike aircraft, with the Sukhoi 30 playing a crucial role in electronic warfare and the Rafale proceeding to its targets, to inflict significant damage on enemy airbases and military installations. The pinpoint accuracy of the strikes, achieved without any loss of Indian assets, underscores the effectiveness of India's surveillance, planning, and delivery systems, heavily reliant on indigenous technology.
The success of Operation Sindoor has far-reaching implications, particularly for China's defence export market. The documented vulnerability of the HQ9 system may deter potential buyers, who might now question its reliability in real combat scenarios. This exposure comes at a time when China, historically dependent on Russian air defence technology, may be looking to acquire more advanced systems like the S500.
India's own air defence capabilities were also on full display. The indigenously developed Akash missile defense system, a short-range surface-to-air missile, proved highly effective in countering Pakistani drones and missiles. This further solidifies India's position as a nation with a robust and increasingly self-reliant defence apparatus.
The operation also brought to the forefront the debate surrounding the jamming of advanced air defence systems. While Russia claims its S-400 system boasts excellent electronic counter-measures, making it highly resistant to jamming, the United States has asserted its capability to overcome such systems. India's successful jamming of the Chinese HQ9, a system considered less sophisticated than the S-400, provides valuable real-world insights for the Americans in this ongoing technological contest.
Regarding this you should read this Article :
Jamming S-400 Air Defence Radars – Claims and Counter Claims
International Acknowledgment
The New York Times acknowledged that India inflicted significant damage on Pakistani facilities, contradicting Pakistani claims of minimal impact. This acknowledgment is significant, as it reflects a rare instance where international media recognized India's strategic and technological advancements in defense .
Speculations on Strikes Near Pakistani Nuclear Facilities
There was discussion on CNN about strikes near Pakistani nuclear facilities, potentially prompting U.S. involvement to de-escalate the conflict. India will not officially confirm strikes on Pakistani nuclear installations due to a 33-year-old agreement where both countries annually exchange lists of their nuclear sites. Air Marshal A.K. Bharti humorously remarked that they "didn't know about Kirana Hills," though India likely had intelligence on such sites .
Conclusion
Operation Sindoor serves as a powerful message to both Pakistan and potentially China. It underscores India's growing technological advantage and the potential vulnerabilities of relying on lower-tier air defence systems. The swift and decisive execution of the operation, with no Indian losses, highlights the effectiveness of India's indigenous defence innovation and its readiness to safeguard its national security interests. The naming of places in Arunachal Pradesh by China appears to be a futile attempt to deflect attention from the significant strategic and technological setback exposed during this operation.